with apologies

February 19, 2010 § 2 Comments

Ah, semantics*.

Our speech patterns influence our behaviors. That’s usually a big “duh” point for people, and for a word junkie like me especially. I tend to be very aware of the words I use (admittedly, often those words completely skip my intended meaning).

Sometimes, though, I catch myself slipping into passive language in a way that drives me nuts. This morning I wrote an email regarding the Women’s Series in which I had to enforce the criteria participating races must meet. If you want to be part of the 3/4 Series, you must provide single-category races for the cat 3 and cat 4 women’s fields. Simple enough, right?

Simple enough to state the criteria, sure, but I felt the need to add a paragraph at the end explaining why I couldn’t offer any exceptions. Why? Because those are the rules? Because it wouldn’t be fair to the other participating races to allow one race to do something different? Both fantastic and valid reasons. Add a little note about how you appreciate everyone who wants to support women’s racing by being part of the Series, and really hope that it works out. Two true and diplomatic statements that keep me stuck to my guns.

But I found myself going beyond those reasonable (even generous) explanations, all the way to the I’m so sorry I hope you don’t think I’m a ball-busting bitch because I can’t give you what you want I really would if I could I swear.

So. Ridiculous.

That is not how I talk. I have no problem being assertive in conversation, and I accept that some people just aren’t going to like what I have to say. But even though there’s nothing wrong with telling someone they can’t change the criteria that they’ve agreed to meet, after doing it I turned into a submissive little thing, offering unnecessary explanations and apologies.

What the hell? Was it because I was speaking for an organization rather than myself? Did I think I was just being nice (which is easy enough to do without the submissive undertones)? Do I unconsciously fall back on self-deprecation as the easy way out of a potentially sticky situation? Did I fall asleep at the wheel?

* Definition 3 (mostly 3b) here.


§ 2 Responses to with apologies

  • velogirl says:

    If you represented the Bay Area Men's Cycling Series, would you feel an explanation was even necessary?Doh! The series exists (in one sense) to incent promoters to offer single-category racing opportunities for women. If you don't enforce that criteria, why bother, right? There were a few recent years where combined 3/4 races (picked separately) were part of the series. I'm so, so glad that current BAWC leadership has moved back into the single-category races. Thank you!

  • Exactly! That's what miffs me so much…it's basically acting like I don't think a women's organization is really worth what we're asking for. Or maybe it's that the work I do isn't worth their consideration. Ether way, gotta work on that.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

What’s this?

You are currently reading with apologies at Elis is a four-letter word.


%d bloggers like this: